Trade for your account.
MAM | PAMM | POA.
Forex prop firm | Asset management company | Personal large funds.
Formal starting from $500,000, test starting from $50,000.
Profits are shared by half (50%), and losses are shared by a quarter (25%).
*No teaching *No selling courses *No discussion *If yes, no reply!


Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management



In the two-way trading of forex investment, traders learn trading skills by apprenticing. While this doesn't guarantee success, it can at least help avoid unnecessary detours.
On Wall Street, the investment and trading industry is often passed down through family inheritance or apprenticeship. This inheritance model stems from the natural development of hundreds of years of foreign financial history. This is very similar to the inheritance model of professions such as doctors, lawyers, and teachers, where experience and skills are passed down from generation to generation through osmosis. This internal inheritance not only reduces learning costs but also provides practitioners with valuable firsthand experience, which is an important and direct reason.
However, in forex investment trading, traders seek more than just the transfer of skills; they seek guidance that can lead to wealth growth. The basic principles of trading are relatively simple, and understanding them does not require expert guidance. The real challenge lies in remaining calm amidst market price fluctuations and account profit and loss fluctuations, enduring loneliness and maintaining prosperity. Principles can be taught by others, but cultivating a mindset and improving one's understanding can only be achieved through personal effort and understanding.
Although self-study is considered a challenging path in forex trading, many choose this path due to a lack of other options. While self-study may not lead to immediate profits, it can at least provide a deeper understanding of trading and even enable traders to identify scams in the market. While there is a vast amount of information available online, through learning and accumulation, traders can gradually develop the ability to distinguish authenticity from fraud.
The essence of forex trading lies in practice. Whether using your own funds or others', practice is an essential part of the learning process. Without funds, it's impossible to truly master the essence of trading. For traders without funds, using others' funds for practice is a challenge. This often requires luck and encountering someone willing to provide opportunities. As for the so-called "myths" online, it's difficult for traders to personally verify their authenticity. Therefore, the most important thing is to focus on your own learning and practice, and to forge a path that suits you.

In the two-way trading landscape of foreign exchange investment, a striking phenomenon is that most Chinese citizens are cautious and evasive about participating in forex trading. Not only do they rarely actively become forex traders, but they rarely even discuss forex investment in their daily financial discussions.
This attitude is not accidental, but rather the result of the long-term interaction of multiple factors, including the domestic policy environment, market order, investor perceptions, and platform regulation. This stands in stark contrast to the general trend in most countries around the world, where forex trading is considered a standard financial product. It also reflects that the development of China's forex trading market is still at a unique stage, and the underlying factors require a multi-dimensional analysis.
From a policy perspective, mainland China has yet to establish a clear and unified legal framework for regulating forex trading. This "policy ambiguity" is the primary factor preventing Chinese citizens from participating in forex trading. Currently, China has not enacted specific laws or regulations explicitly permitting or prohibiting individuals from engaging in overseas foreign exchange transactions. Relevant regulatory rules are scattered throughout the administrative regulations of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (such as the "Measures for the Administration of Individual Foreign Exchange") and in risk warnings issued by financial regulatory authorities. For example, individuals may exchange up to US$50,000 in foreign exchange annually for genuine purposes. However, regulatory authorities explicitly prohibit the use of foreign exchange for "illegal purposes" such as overseas speculation. However, they fail to clearly define the nature of "individuals engaging in foreign exchange trading through compliant overseas platforms," ​​leaving foreign exchange trading in a gray area, neither clearly legal nor completely prohibited. This ambiguity leaves ordinary citizens concerned about the uncertainty of compliance risks. On the one hand, they worry about violating foreign exchange regulations by engaging in foreign exchange trading, resulting in the risk of fund freezes and penalties. On the other hand, if subsequent policies are tightened, existing transactions may face difficulties in closing positions and repatriating funds. In contrast, most countries around the world (such as the United States, EU member states, and Australia) implement strict licensing regulations for domestic and international forex platforms through specialized regulatory bodies (e.g., the US National Financial Conduct Authority (NFA) and the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Individuals can legally participate in trading through licensed platforms, with extremely transparent policies and no need to worry about compliance risks. This policy difference has directly led Chinese citizens to avoid participating in forex trading.
The current chaotic and prevalent scams in mainland China's forex trading market have further exacerbated the fears of Chinese citizens, leading to forex trading becoming a financial sector with a negative reputation. In recent years, a large number of scams under the guise of "foreign exchange trading" have emerged in China. These scams use false claims such as "high returns," "guaranteed profits," and "leading by renowned experts" to lure unsophisticated investors into the market. Common schemes include: setting up "fake forex platforms" without actual trading, manipulating backend data to create false profits, and then absconding with the funds after investors increase their investment; charging high fees under the guise of "foreign exchange training" and "copy trading" while offering strategies with no practical value, leading to investor losses; and employing a pyramid scheme-style recruitment model to encourage investors to recruit downlines for commissions, essentially unrelated to forex trading and serving as illegal fundraising tools. These scams not only cause significant financial losses for investors, but also spread through negative news reports, fostering the public's misconception that "foreign exchange trading equals fraud." Even when faced with legitimate forex trading opportunities, they avoid them out of fear of being scammed, severely damaging the reputation of forex trading in China and creating a vicious cycle where "more scams, more investor fear, and more difficulty in conducting legitimate trading."
Investors' cognitive biases regarding foreign exchange trading are also a major factor in their reluctance to participate and their vulnerability to losses. Most Chinese citizens lack a systematic and scientific understanding of forex trading. They neither understand the market's "two-way volatility" and leverage-induced risk amplification, nor master basic technical analysis and risk management knowledge. Yet, they harbor unrealistic expectations for profit. Many investors equate forex trading with a "guaranteed profit," even comparing it to the stable returns of bank deposits. They overlook the fact that forex trading is inherently a "high-risk, high-volatility" investment, where profits rely on "long-term accumulation of probabilistic advantages" rather than short-term guaranteed gains. This cognitive bias directly leads to irrational decision-making in practice: for example, blindly using high leverage (e.g., 100x or more) in pursuit of "quick gains" while neglecting position management; refusing to cut losses when losses occur, hoping for a "market reversal," leading to further losses; and blindly trusting "other people's calls" and lacking independent judgment, ultimately falling into the trap of "frequent losses, a collapse of confidence, and a rejection of forex trading." In reality, the foreign exchange market, like other financial markets, adheres to the "80/20 rule"—only approximately 20% of traders achieve consistent profits, while the remaining 80% experience losses or break-even. However, due to a lack of understanding, most Chinese investors fail to accept the reality that losses are normal. Once they experience losses, they view forex trading as an "unreliable investment" and choose to stay away.
Furthermore, the proliferation of non-compliant forex platforms in the domestic market and the lack of effective safeguards for investor funds are also key obstacles hindering Chinese citizens' participation in forex trading. Currently, with the exception of a few banks with special approval that can conduct individual spot forex trading (without leverage and with limited trading products), most offshore forex platforms operating in China have not received approval from Chinese financial regulators. Some platforms even lack valid regulatory licenses from any country or region, constituting "unlicensed operations." These non-compliant platforms often harm investors through tactics like back-office trading intervention, withdrawal restrictions, and slippage manipulation. For example, they deliberately increase slippage during periods of volatile market fluctuations (e.g., an investor's entry price is set at 1.0850, but the actual transaction price is 1.0880), resulting in additional losses. When investors request withdrawals, they delay or deny them with excuses like "account anomalies" or "taxes due," or even freeze their accounts outright. Some platforms even exploit "reverse copy trading" to profit from investors' losses. This environment of "unsafe fund security and questionable trading fairness" deters investors from investing, even if they are willing to try forex trading, for fear of losing their principal, further shrinking participation in domestic forex trading.
Overall, Chinese citizens' cautious attitude toward two-way forex trading is the result of a combination of compliance concerns stemming from policy ambiguity, a trust crisis caused by market turmoil, risk misjudgment due to insufficient investor awareness, and security risks stemming from a lack of platform oversight. To improve this situation, regulators must not only clarify the legal status of foreign exchange trading and strengthen crackdowns on illegal platforms, but also enhance public awareness of the foreign exchange market through investor education. At the same time, they should promote the orderly entry of compliant overseas platforms into the domestic market, gradually establishing a foreign exchange trading environment characterized by transparent policies, standardized procedures, and manageable risks. This will allow Chinese citizens to consider foreign exchange trading as a diversified financial option, rather than a high-risk activity to avoid, while remaining legal and compliant.

In the two-way trading of foreign exchange investment, traders inevitably pay a price in their pursuit of success, often in the form of tuition fees. This includes not only monetary losses, but also time and various hidden costs. The extent of these costs depends on the trader's savvy, planning, and financial resources. Even talented traders need a long time to accumulate experience and develop a comprehensive trading system.
The tuition fees in foreign exchange investment trading are essentially the funds lost during the trading process. We often jokingly refer to this as "paying tuition." If a trader's trading progresses smoothly, they may not have to pay much tuition; however, if things go poorly, the tuition may continue unchecked until the trader has exhausted all their funds. Those who claim to teach forex trading and charge tuition are often wasting traders' time and money.
How much tuition a trader needs to pay depends on their learning ability and understanding of the market. Some traders may pay tuition throughout their lives, while others may not have to pay a penny. When a trader stops losing money and achieves consistent profits, they can be considered to have paid their tuition. Some may start making profits within two or three months, while others may never make a profit. This depends on the trader's affinity with the forex market, with interest, determination, and passion playing a key role. Some traders may continue to lose money throughout their lives, while others may find success and start making profits within three to five years.
In forex trading, short-term traders often lack confidence in their trading strategies. This skepticism itself is a misguided approach. Globally renowned investment banks and fund managers typically avoid short-term trading, as they are well aware of its limitations. If traders can recognize the difficulty of short-term trading, they have already taken the first step towards success. Otherwise, even if they engage in short-term trading for 20 years, frequently making small deposits, they will find it difficult to achieve profitability, let alone understand the true nature of forex trading.
Currently, short-term forex trading is virtually unpopular, and the global forex market is stagnant. This is primarily due to the scarcity of short-term traders. Forex currencies exhibit few clear trends, as major central banks around the world generally implement low or even negative interest rates. Interest rates for major currencies are closely linked to those of the US dollar. Consequently, currency values ​​remain relatively stable, lacking clear trends, and short-term trading opportunities are consequently limited. Currencies mostly fluctuate within a narrow range, making it difficult for short-term traders to identify suitable opportunities.
If traders recognize the necessity of long-term investment, they are already well on their way to success. While still addressing emotions such as greed and fear, adopting a light-weight, long-term strategy can effectively mitigate risk. If a trader holds an overly heavy position, they will find it difficult to withstand these emotional shocks. Therefore, the correct approach for experienced investors is to maintain multiple, light positions along the moving average. This strategy can both resist the temptation of greed brought on by unrealized gains during a significant trend extension and withstand the fear caused by unrealized losses during a significant pullback, thereby maintaining a relatively stable mindset and trading rhythm amidst market fluctuations.

In forex trading, many traders hesitate to continue investing because they suffered significant losses in their early days due to heavy positions. This experience not only caused financial losses but also left a deep psychological scar, instilling fear and distrust in the market and making them hesitant to enter the market again.
This phenomenon is particularly common among novice traders, who often blindly use high leverage to engage in heavy, short-term trading without sufficient knowledge and experience. Once they encounter market volatility, they may suffer huge losses and lose the courage and confidence to continue trading.
However, if traders adopt a light-weight, long-term strategy from the outset, the situation could be very different. Light-weight trading effectively reduces the risk of individual trades, allowing traders to remain relatively calm and rational in the face of market fluctuations. Long-term trading allows traders to observe market trends over a longer timeframe, avoiding impulsive decisions driven by short-term fluctuations. This strategy not only helps reduce psychological stress during trading but also provides traders with more stable profit opportunities. By adopting a light-weight, long-term approach, traders can gradually accumulate experience and deepen their understanding of the market, leading to steady profits over the long term.
Just as with everything in life, the beginning is equally crucial in forex trading. If traders can find the right approach from the outset, they are more likely to maintain confidence and motivation in subsequent trades and avoid giving up due to early setbacks. This is similar to many other areas of life. Many people fail to achieve success at the outset without proper guidance, one can only rely on their own experience to move forward. Once they encounter setbacks, they can become trapped and unable to extricate themselves, even impacting their future development. The same is true for forex trading. If traders receive proper guidance from the outset and adopt sound strategies, such as a light-weight, long-term approach, they are more likely to make steady progress in the market and gradually accumulate wealth.
Therefore, it is crucial for forex traders to plan their trading path well from the outset. They need to understand that a light-weight, long-term approach is not just a trading strategy, but also a sound investment mindset. By doing so, traders can maintain stability amidst market fluctuations, gradually accumulate experience, and ultimately achieve long-term profit goals. This strategy not only helps traders avoid significant early losses but also builds a solid foundation for long-term success in the forex market.

In the two-way trading landscape of forex investment, a trader's ability to accurately identify the identities of various market participants is often a key indicator of their trading proficiency and depth of market knowledge.
When a forex trader can easily and accurately discern the true attributes of different market players—for example, identifying those "pseudo-traders" (essentially analysts) who appear to possess practical skills but are only adept at theoretical analysis, distinguishing between truly experienced traders and market novices, and discerning between veterans with sophisticated trading systems and trainers or salespeople masquerading as traders for marketing purposes—this signifies that the trader has transcended the cognitive realm of the "ordinary novice" and is highly likely to become a successful, consistently profitable trader. This ability to discern isn't innate; it stems from a keen sense of practical and non-practical logic, cultivated through years of practical experience, as well as a deep understanding of the behavioral traits and thinking patterns of different roles. It's one of the core competitive advantages that traders develop through continuous trial and error, review, and analysis in the market.
The key to accurately identifying those who appear to be traders but are actually analysts is to observe whether their statements and actions revolve around practical application. When sharing their opinions or experiences, true traders focus on the specific details of their trading decisions—for example, "How to adjust stop-loss points according to position management rules when EUR/USD falls below 1.0850 and trading volume increases?" or "How to quickly revise existing swing trading strategies in the face of a sudden shift in Fed rate hike expectations." Their explanations include clear market scenarios, operating conditions, and risk control measures, and their content is replicable and verifiable. "Traders in disguise," essentially analysts, tend to offer macro-level trend predictions or theoretical interpretations, such as "The US dollar index will enter a long-term upward cycle" or "The moving average system shows a bullish trend." These statements often lack specific entry points or stop-loss and take-profit setting methods, and fail to consider the adaptability of strategies based on different capital sizes and risk appetites. Essentially, these analyses are static, based on historical data or theoretical models, and cannot directly guide actual operations. Furthermore, when market conditions deviate from expectations, analysts are more likely to fall into the trap of "finding justifications for theoretical consistency," whereas actual traders prioritize adjusting their operations based on market fluctuations rather than clinging to their original judgments. This behavioral difference is the core distinction between the two.
Distinguishing between "real traders" and "novice traders" requires assessing the maturity of their trading logic, the depth of their risk awareness, and the stability of their behavioral habits. The trading logic of experienced traders is "closed-loop"—forming a complete decision-making chain, from market analysis, position setting, stop-loss and take-profit planning, to contingency plans for unexpected market fluctuations. This logic has been verified in long-term practical experience and possesses the characteristic of a "positive risk-reward ratio." For example, experienced traders will clearly state that "when using range trading in volatile markets, the risk exposure of a single transaction shall not exceed 1.5% of the principal, and partial profit-taking shall be implemented when the profit reaches 1.5 times the risk." Each step of the operation is supported by clear rules. However, the trading logic of novice traders is often "fragmented" and "random." Their decisions are more dependent on single signals or the advice of others, lacking an overall strategic framework. They neither consider whether the market type is suitable for the signal nor evaluate the compatibility of the stop-loss range with the principal tolerance. In terms of risk awareness, experienced traders clearly understand that losses are the norm in trading and limit losses to a manageable level through strict risk control. Novices, on the other hand, tend to fall into the trap of striving for a profit on every trade. When faced with losses, they either blindly hold onto their positions or frequently implement stop-loss orders, resulting in extremely inconsistent behavior. These characteristics clearly differentiate the two.
The key to distinguishing between experienced and novice traders lies in their ability to cope with market uncertainty and the adaptability of their trading systems. Experienced traders, having experienced the full range of market cycles (including trends, volatile markets, and black swan events), have a deep understanding of market unpredictability. Consequently, their trading systems are equipped with dynamic adjustments. For example, when market volatility rises significantly, they proactively reduce their positions and narrow their stop-loss orders to mitigate against sharp market fluctuations. After a long period of narrow range consolidation, they develop preemptive breakout strategies to avoid being caught off guard by sudden market fluctuations. Furthermore, experienced traders are able to maintain a stable mindset when faced with consecutive losses. Through market review, they can quickly identify the cause of the losses (whether the market is beyond the system's adaptive range or there are deviations in the execution process) and make targeted adjustments, rather than questioning their own systems or falling prey to emotional trading. Novice traders, on the other hand, lack an understanding of market uncertainty and often use static, rigid trading systems. For example, they consistently use the same position size and stop-loss ratios regardless of market volatility or trends. When faced with consecutive losses, they are prone to self-denial and blindly switching strategies, making it difficult to maintain consistency in their operations amidst market fluctuations. This difference in market adaptability is the core difference between experienced and novice traders.
To identify "trainers or salespeople disguised as traders," one must pay attention to the commercial orientation of their behavior and the utilitarian nature of their content. The core goal of these groups is to generate profits by attracting traders to training courses or opening trading accounts. Therefore, their statements deliberately exaggerate trading profit potential and downplay risk warnings. For example, claims such as "Our exclusive strategy can achieve a stable monthly return of 20%" or "Follow our call signals, even newbies can quickly profit." These statements often lack objective data support and deliberately avoid trading risks (such as margin calls and regulatory risks). During communication, they frequently steer the conversation towards commercial information such as "training course content" and "account opening promotions," rather than focusing on pure trading techniques. When faced with traders' questions about practical details, they either remain vague or redirect the conversation to "accessing the complete strategy after joining the course." Their behavior is relentlessly centered around "converting customers" rather than sharing real-world experience. In contrast, genuine traders actively highlight risks during communication, emphasizing that "trading has no shortcuts and requires long-term accumulation." They also refrain from inducing others to engage in commercial partnerships in any way. This difference in "commercial attributes" is a key clue to identifying imposters.
In summary, the ability to accurately identify different roles in the forex market is essentially a reflection of a trader's own practical understanding. Only when a trader develops mature practical logic, a deep understanding of risk, and stable operational habits can they see beyond surface phenomena to the essential characteristics of different roles and make accurate judgments. The development of this ability signals that a trader has transcended the confusion and blindness of the novice stage and entered the mature stage of "rational trading and stable profits," becoming a competitive and successful trader in the market.




13711580480@139.com
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
z.x.n@139.com
Mr. Z-X-N
China · Guangzhou